Hi,

Yes, the difference is by gender. I've given it a ago, but am a little
unsure about the conclusion.


    | Male    |  Female
------------------------
Yes | o: 94        o: 17
    | e: 88.5      e: 22.5
    |
No  | o: 36        o: 16
    | e: 41.5      e: 10.5

Overall: 163

The expected was calculated for each of the cells using 

(the sum of the row * the sum of the column) / the total

Using ((o-e)^2)/e I got a chi s of 5.29.

I think the df for the table is 1 (is it (rows-1)*(columns -1))

Therefore using a table, p 0.05 is 3.84 and p 0.01 is 6.63

so it is significant to p 0.05 but not quite all the way to 0.01

What does that mean?

There is a significant difference between the yes and no proportions
that males and females gave?

Such that males were statstically more inclined to say yes (ratio of
male yes:no is 5.5:1 whereas the females is 2.25:1)

Am I on the right tracks?

Thanks for any help, it is very much apprecieted!  Its quite important
I get this right.

Thanks again, Katie x
.
.
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the
problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at:
.                  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/                    .
=================================================================

Reply via email to