Hi Oliver, Thanks for your mail!
> it doesnt take a week to show up at http://www.novarata.net/mootbot/ > the advantage is that votes and actions are specifically handled and > that the bot only logs between the "startmeeting" and "endmeeting" > commands ... so its way easier to read the log ... First: startmeeting/endmeeting. It's easier to read, but just as easy as to look up the time in the irclogs and link to that specific minute. IF you want to take a look at the last Meeting Log https://wiki.edubuntu.org/Edubuntu/WikiSite/Meeting/Logs/2009-09-11 THEN you will find a link to the raw log that starts exactly when the meeting began ENDIF Cons for using mootbot - someone has to not forget to say startmeeting and endmeeting. I someone remembers after some time, then a part of the meeting is not logged. Pro's for using mootbot - voting registration, clear topics if there is an ageanda, easy summarizing Con: - someone has to have the discipline to use mootbot very concisely. - someone needs to be chair. - backup chair is needed too. Who wants to be chair of the next edubuntu meeting!? Pro: - summarizing a meeting without mootbot is hell. - summarizing a meeting without agenda, clear goals, chair, internal discussion discipline is quadruple hell. I don't think I will do a lot of summarizing in the near future. Maybe the raw logs is just what we need from the meetings.... I don't know. It seems that people got by in the majority of the past with just the raw logs. > if you have specific questions, just ping Seeker in #ubuntu-scribes I'm on it :-) Cheerios, Ace -- edubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/edubuntu-devel
