> RAID 5 is not the most fault tolerant -- although it is better than RAID0 > or no RAID at all. > http://www.miracleas.com/BAARF/RAID5_versus_RAID10.txt
What was in my head didn't completely make it to the screen, I was thinking RAID5 is the most fault tolerant for the money, not out of all options. I personally chose RAID10 (RAID 1+0) but many cheaper RAID controllers don't handle that and RAID10 sacrifices a good share of drive space, where RAID5 looses less. Thanks for straightening me out Gavin. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by the Cotter Technology Department, and is believed to be clean. -- edubuntu-users mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/edubuntu-users
