Not exactly. If the terms and conditions of uni-wiki give over the copyright to the professor where xe is allowed to release the rights under the CC BY-SA.
--Guerillero On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Gorilla Warfare <[email protected]> wrote: > I worry a bit about your mention of "Once the work was completed, the > professor himself did the edit, presumably after checking for outside > edits done while the project was ongoing." As far as Wikipedia's > licensing goes, that raises a lot of questions about proper > attribution. > > - GorillaWarfare > > On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Martin Walker <[email protected]> wrote: >> A colleague of mine from our geology department has run article improvement >> projects for US undergraduates, and he found it very beneficial to have the >> main editing work done on a separate geology wiki (running Mediawiki) on a >> college server. Pictures were still uploaded to Wikimedia Commons (and >> therefore could be read in the college wiki). He was easily able to use the >> history feature to track students' contributions. Once the work was >> completed, the professor himself did the edit, presumably after checking for >> outside edits done while the project was ongoing. Students were able to >> improve Wikipedia, and see their real-world impact (a very poor article is >> now good and gets 70,000 hits a year). >> >> For what you're proposing, I think a separate wiki like this would be >> essential. That way the chaos is contained and the Wikipedia biologists >> aren't going nuts; also, you can assess the students' contributions more >> easily. Once the work is complete, improved articles can be integrated into >> the main Wikipedia and everyone benefits. >> >> Martin >> >> Martin A. Walker >> Department of Chemistry >> State University of New York at Potsdam >> +1 (315) 267-2271 >> [email protected] >> >> On 10/2/2012 10:51 AM, Dimce Grozdanoski wrote: >>> >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> I want to open discussion and hear some practical ideas or real stories >>> about projects with large scale editing participation, or how to >>> distribute assessment to the editors/students who are geographically >>> distributed throughout the country. >>> >>> For example, let's say that we want to recruit 10000 students grouped in >>> class groups in particular schools to work on biology topics. Each >>> school must follow the teaching plan / time-line according to the >>> adopted methodology, i.e. they start with general biological terms then >>> with kingdoms, ecosystems, interactions of living bing in ecosystem, >>> evolution, and so on ... And the teachers give one or two assessment per >>> student of biology in particular class in particular school, to write >>> new or improve already written article in wikipedia. How to menage this >>> process? How to measure student work? The goals are to create maximal >>> number of articles with good quality. How to deal with projects of this >>> kind in limited time if you have time window of 6 months to start and >>> finish the project. >>> >>> Any idea, >>> >>> Dimce Grozdanoski >>> Wikimedia Macedonia >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Education mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Education mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education > > _______________________________________________ > Education mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education _______________________________________________ Education mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education
