Why not do the same work on a userpage/workbench? Then the licence is no 
problem and the students will know they are doing it for real.
That's what I an going to do with a wikibook project (Swedish). Then you do not 
have to learn how to put up an own wiki on a server.
/Harald

> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 12:28:07 -0500
> Subject: Re: [Wikimedia Education] Quantitative Metric and Article Quality
> 
> The first and most obvious difference to me is the hardware, software, and 
> the know-how required to set up another wiki, which most professors unlikely 
> have. I, too, am interested in learning benefits of this strategy.
> 
> Rob
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: domusaurea
> Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 12:07 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Wikimedia Education] Quantitative Metric and Article Quality
> 
> How would you evaluate the difference between a separate wiki and the 
> sandboxes?
> 
> Juliana
> 
> Enviado via iPhone
> 
> Em 03/10/2012, às 12:57, "Martin Walker" <[email protected]> escreveu:
> 
> > A colleague of mine from our geology department has run article 
> > improvement projects for US undergraduates, and he found it very 
> > beneficial to have the main editing work done on a separate geology wiki 
> > (running Mediawiki) on a college server.  Pictures were still uploaded to 
> > Wikimedia Commons (and therefore could be read in the college wiki).  He 
> > was easily able to use the history feature to track students' 
> > contributions.  Once the work was completed, the professor himself did the 
> > edit, presumably after checking for outside edits done while the project 
> > was ongoing.  Students were able to improve Wikipedia, and see their 
> > real-world impact (a very poor article is now good and gets 70,000 hits a 
> > year).
> >
> > For what you're proposing, I think a separate wiki like this would be 
> > essential.  That way the chaos is contained and the Wikipedia biologists 
> > aren't going nuts; also, you can assess the students' contributions more 
> > easily.  Once the work is complete, improved articles can be integrated 
> > into the main Wikipedia and everyone benefits.
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > Martin A. Walker
> > Department of Chemistry
> > State University of New York at Potsdam
> > +1 (315) 267-2271
> > [email protected]
> >
> > On 10/2/2012 10:51 AM, Dimce Grozdanoski wrote:
> >> Hi folks,
> >>
> >> I want to open discussion and hear some practical ideas or real stories
> >> about projects with large scale editing participation, or how to
> >> distribute assessment to the editors/students who are geographically
> >> distributed throughout the country.
> >>
> >> For example, let's say that we want to recruit 10000 students grouped in
> >> class groups in particular schools to work on biology topics. Each
> >> school must follow the teaching plan / time-line according to the
> >> adopted methodology, i.e. they start with general biological terms then
> >> with kingdoms, ecosystems, interactions of living bing in ecosystem,
> >> evolution, and so on ... And the teachers give one or two assessment per
> >> student of biology in particular class in particular school, to write
> >> new or improve already written article in wikipedia. How to menage this
> >> process? How to measure student work? The goals are to create maximal
> >> number of articles with good quality. How to deal with projects of this
> >> kind in limited time if you have time window of 6 months to start and
> >> finish the project.
> >>
> >> Any idea,
> >>
> >> Dimce Grozdanoski
> >> Wikimedia Macedonia
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Education mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Education mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Education mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Education mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education
                                          
_______________________________________________
Education mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education

Reply via email to