Israel has developed quite an advanced model to assess student work in
Wikipedia. I recommend you look at their classroom-tested work here:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2b/Article_Assessment_for_Student_Assignments_%E2%80%93_For_Teacher.pdf


This guide also written by WMIL may also be of interest (and used as a
starting point for your own adaptation?):

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/84/WMIL_-_
A_Guide_to_Writing_Articles_about_Awards_Winning_Scientists.pdf

Best regards,

Vahid.

On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Kleefeld, John <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hello all:
>
>
>
> I’d like build a catalogue or inventory of assessment (grading) rubrics
> for Wikipedia assignments, ranging from the simplest assignments to the
> most complex. I’m not referring to a grading structure (10% for this, 50%
> for that, etc.), but to a set of objective criteria for assessing the
> contributions within that structure. Usually, this will be in a
> two-dimensional format with “descriptors” that assess proficiency in
> various “dimensions” (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rubric_(academic)),
> though other formats are possible. I’ve reviewed various materials,
> including the WikiEdu grading page (http://ask.wikiedu.org/
> questions/scope:all/sort:activity-desc/tags:grading/page:1/) and found
> some useful guidance at pages 14-19 of the Case Studies document. But I’d
> like to see if any of this has been translated into the kinds of rubrics
> I’m thinking of. I’m open to seeing what you’ve done in any discipline,
> even if it doesn’t follow the format I’m describing.
>
>
>
> Apologies for any duplication between this list and the education-request
> list.
>
>
>
> John Kleefeld
>
> Associate Professor, College of Law
>
> University of Saskatchewan
>
> 15 Campus Drive
>
> Saskatoon SK  S7N 5A6
>
>
>
> tel:          (+1) 306.966.1039
>
> email:    [email protected]
>
> skype:    johnkleefeld
>
> twitter: @johnkleefeld
>
> web:       http://law.usask.ca/find-people/faculty/kleefeld-john.php
>
>
>
> Read my most recent article, co-authored with former student Kate Rattray,
> on editing Wikipedia for law school credit: *http://ssrn.com/abstract=2729241
> <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2729241>.*
>
>
>
> Also, just published—“Contributory Fault at 90,” my book chapter in Quill
> & Friel’s *Damages and Compensation Culture: *
> http://www.bloomsbury.com/au/damages-and-compensation-
> culture-9781849467971.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Education mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education
>
>


-- 
Vahid Masrour
Community Capacity Manager, Wikipedia Education Program
[email protected]
https://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/Education
_______________________________________________
Education mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education

Reply via email to