Thank you Vahid for sharing with the education mailing list WMIL article assessment. We also have another grading tool:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f5/Article_Quality_in_WMIL_Enterprises_Measurement_System_and_Assessment_Indicator.pdf Please feel free to contact me if you need any further information. Kind regards, Michal *Regards,* *Michal Lester,* *Executive DirectorWikimedia Israel* *http://www.wikimedia.org.il <http://www.wikimedia.org.il/> * *972-50-8996046 ; 972-77-751-6032 * 2016-10-08 1:43 GMT+03:00 Vahid Masrour <[email protected]>: > Israel has developed quite an advanced model to assess student work in > Wikipedia. I recommend you look at their classroom-tested work here: > https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2b/Article_ > Assessment_for_Student_Assignments_%E2%80%93_For_Teacher.pdf > > This guide also written by WMIL may also be of interest (and used as a > starting point for your own adaptation?): > > https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/84/WMIL_-_A > _Guide_to_Writing_Articles_about_Awards_Winning_Scientists.pdf > > Best regards, > > Vahid. > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Kleefeld, John <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hello all: >> >> >> >> I’d like build a catalogue or inventory of assessment (grading) rubrics >> for Wikipedia assignments, ranging from the simplest assignments to the >> most complex. I’m not referring to a grading structure (10% for this, 50% >> for that, etc.), but to a set of objective criteria for assessing the >> contributions within that structure. Usually, this will be in a >> two-dimensional format with “descriptors” that assess proficiency in >> various “dimensions” (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ >> Rubric_(academic)), though other formats are possible. I’ve reviewed >> various materials, including the WikiEdu grading page ( >> http://ask.wikiedu.org/questions/scope:all/sort:activity- >> desc/tags:grading/page:1/) and found some useful guidance at pages 14-19 >> of the Case Studies document. But I’d like to see if any of this has been >> translated into the kinds of rubrics I’m thinking of. I’m open to seeing >> what you’ve done in any discipline, even if it doesn’t follow the format >> I’m describing. >> >> >> >> Apologies for any duplication between this list and the education-request >> list. >> >> >> >> John Kleefeld >> >> Associate Professor, College of Law >> >> University of Saskatchewan >> >> 15 Campus Drive >> >> Saskatoon SK S7N 5A6 >> >> >> >> tel: (+1) 306.966.1039 >> >> email: [email protected] >> >> skype: johnkleefeld >> >> twitter: @johnkleefeld >> >> web: http://law.usask.ca/find-people/faculty/kleefeld-john.php >> >> >> >> Read my most recent article, co-authored with former student Kate >> Rattray, on editing Wikipedia for law school credit: >> *http://ssrn.com/abstract=2729241 >> <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2729241>.* >> >> >> >> Also, just published—“Contributory Fault at 90,” my book chapter in Quill >> & Friel’s *Damages and Compensation Culture: * >> http://www.bloomsbury.com/au/damages-and-compensation-cultur >> e-9781849467971. >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Education mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education >> >> > > > -- > Vahid Masrour > Community Capacity Manager, Wikipedia Education Program > [email protected] > https://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/Education > > > _______________________________________________ > Education mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education > >
_______________________________________________ Education mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education
