Vahid, thank you very much. It’s just the sort of thing I’m looking for. This 
would require some adaptation (for instance, the Wikimedia Israel rubric is 
premised solely on writing, rather than editing, articles), but it’s a good 
start.

John
 

On 2016-10-08, 9:00 AM, "Education on behalf of 
[email protected]" <[email protected] 
on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:

    Send Education mailing list submissions to
        [email protected]
    
    To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education
    or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [email protected]
    
    You can reach the person managing the list at
        [email protected]
    
    When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
    than "Re: Contents of Education digest..."
    
    
    Today's Topics:
    
       1. Re: Assessment Rubrics for Wikipedia  Assignments (Vahid Masrour)
    
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Message: 1
    Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 17:43:24 -0500
    From: Vahid Masrour <[email protected]>
    To: Wikimedia Education <[email protected]>
    Subject: Re: [Wikimedia Education] Assessment Rubrics for Wikipedia
        Assignments
    Message-ID:
        <cackursfbmhp1mq4phgowx8ej3yh59ty9cenzuy2zb93qh-r...@mail.gmail.com>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
    
    Israel has developed quite an advanced model to assess student work in
    Wikipedia. I recommend you look at their classroom-tested work here:
    
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2b/Article_Assessment_for_Student_Assignments_%E2%80%93_For_Teacher.pdf
    
    
    This guide also written by WMIL may also be of interest (and used as a
    starting point for your own adaptation?):
    
    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/84/WMIL_-_
    A_Guide_to_Writing_Articles_about_Awards_Winning_Scientists.pdf
    
    Best regards,
    
    Vahid.
    
    On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Kleefeld, John <[email protected]>
    wrote:
    
    > Hello all:
    >
    >
    >
    > I’d like build a catalogue or inventory of assessment (grading) rubrics
    > for Wikipedia assignments, ranging from the simplest assignments to the
    > most complex. I’m not referring to a grading structure (10% for this, 50%
    > for that, etc.), but to a set of objective criteria for assessing the
    > contributions within that structure. Usually, this will be in a
    > two-dimensional format with “descriptors” that assess proficiency in
    > various “dimensions” (see 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rubric_(academic)),
    > though other formats are possible. I’ve reviewed various materials,
    > including the WikiEdu grading page (http://ask.wikiedu.org/
    > questions/scope:all/sort:activity-desc/tags:grading/page:1/) and found
    > some useful guidance at pages 14-19 of the Case Studies document. But I’d
    > like to see if any of this has been translated into the kinds of rubrics
    > I’m thinking of. I’m open to seeing what you’ve done in any discipline,
    > even if it doesn’t follow the format I’m describing.
    >
    >
    >
    > Apologies for any duplication between this list and the education-request
    > list.
    >
    >
    >
    > John Kleefeld
    >
    > Associate Professor, College of Law
    >
    > University of Saskatchewan
    >
    > 15 Campus Drive
    >
    > Saskatoon SK  S7N 5A6
    >
    >
    >
    > tel:          (+1) 306.966.1039
    >
    > email:    [email protected]
    >
    > skype:    johnkleefeld
    >
    > twitter: @johnkleefeld
    >
    > web:       http://law.usask.ca/find-people/faculty/kleefeld-john.php
    >
    >
    >
    > Read my most recent article, co-authored with former student Kate Rattray,
    > on editing Wikipedia for law school credit: 
*http://ssrn.com/abstract=2729241
    > <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2729241>.*
    >
    >
    >
    > Also, just published—“Contributory Fault at 90,” my book chapter in Quill
    > & Friel’s *Damages and Compensation Culture: *
    > http://www.bloomsbury.com/au/damages-and-compensation-
    > culture-9781849467971.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > Education mailing list
    > [email protected]
    > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education
    >
    >
    
    
    -- 
    Vahid Masrour
    Community Capacity Manager, Wikipedia Education Program
    [email protected]
    https://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/Education
    -------------- next part --------------
    An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
    URL: 
<https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/education/attachments/20161007/556dd801/attachment-0001.html>
    
    ------------------------------
    
    Subject: Digest Footer
    
    _______________________________________________
    Education mailing list
    [email protected]
    https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education
    
    
    ------------------------------
    
    End of Education Digest, Vol 65, Issue 2
    ****************************************
    

_______________________________________________
Education mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education

Reply via email to