Thank you, Michal! John Kleefeld
On 2016-10-09, 9:00 AM, "Education on behalf of [email protected]" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: Send Education mailing list submissions to [email protected] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [email protected] You can reach the person managing the list at [email protected] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Education digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Assessment Rubrics for Wikipedia Assignments (Michal Lester) 2. Re: Education Digest, Vol 65, Issue 2 (Kleefeld, John) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2016 21:33:09 +0300 From: Michal Lester <[email protected]> To: Wikimedia Education <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Wikimedia Education] Assessment Rubrics for Wikipedia Assignments Message-ID: <CAJRggWMyaq4Aigt=_zgforpnxvo2uxvqkv2jcyx-zyypi8q...@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Thank you Vahid for sharing with the education mailing list WMIL article assessment. We also have another grading tool: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f5/Article_Quality_in_WMIL_Enterprises_Measurement_System_and_Assessment_Indicator.pdf Please feel free to contact me if you need any further information. Kind regards, Michal *Regards,* *Michal Lester,* *Executive DirectorWikimedia Israel* *http://www.wikimedia.org.il <http://www.wikimedia.org.il/> * *972-50-8996046 ; 972-77-751-6032 * 2016-10-08 1:43 GMT+03:00 Vahid Masrour <[email protected]>: > Israel has developed quite an advanced model to assess student work in > Wikipedia. I recommend you look at their classroom-tested work here: > https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2b/Article_ > Assessment_for_Student_Assignments_%E2%80%93_For_Teacher.pdf > > This guide also written by WMIL may also be of interest (and used as a > starting point for your own adaptation?): > > https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/84/WMIL_-_A > _Guide_to_Writing_Articles_about_Awards_Winning_Scientists.pdf > > Best regards, > > Vahid. > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Kleefeld, John <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hello all: >> >> >> >> I’d like build a catalogue or inventory of assessment (grading) rubrics >> for Wikipedia assignments, ranging from the simplest assignments to the >> most complex. I’m not referring to a grading structure (10% for this, 50% >> for that, etc.), but to a set of objective criteria for assessing the >> contributions within that structure. Usually, this will be in a >> two-dimensional format with “descriptors” that assess proficiency in >> various “dimensions” (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ >> Rubric_(academic)), though other formats are possible. I’ve reviewed >> various materials, including the WikiEdu grading page ( >> http://ask.wikiedu.org/questions/scope:all/sort:activity- >> desc/tags:grading/page:1/) and found some useful guidance at pages 14-19 >> of the Case Studies document. But I’d like to see if any of this has been >> translated into the kinds of rubrics I’m thinking of. I’m open to seeing >> what you’ve done in any discipline, even if it doesn’t follow the format >> I’m describing. >> >> >> >> Apologies for any duplication between this list and the education-request >> list. >> >> >> >> John Kleefeld >> >> Associate Professor, College of Law >> >> University of Saskatchewan >> >> 15 Campus Drive >> >> Saskatoon SK S7N 5A6 >> >> >> >> tel: (+1) 306.966.1039 >> >> email: [email protected] >> >> skype: johnkleefeld >> >> twitter: @johnkleefeld >> >> web: http://law.usask.ca/find-people/faculty/kleefeld-john.php >> >> >> >> Read my most recent article, co-authored with former student Kate >> Rattray, on editing Wikipedia for law school credit: *http://ssrn.com/abstract=2729241 >> <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2729241>.* >> >> >> >> Also, just published—“Contributory Fault at 90,” my book chapter in Quill >> & Friel’s *Damages and Compensation Culture: * >> http://www.bloomsbury.com/au/damages-and-compensation-cultur >> e-9781849467971. >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Education mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education >> >> > > > -- > Vahid Masrour > Community Capacity Manager, Wikipedia Education Program > [email protected] > https://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/Education > > > _______________________________________________ > Education mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/education/attachments/20161008/2fcba7c8/attachment-0001.html> ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2016 00:16:19 +0000 From: "Kleefeld, John" <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Wikimedia Education] Education Digest, Vol 65, Issue 2 Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Vahid, thank you very much. It’s just the sort of thing I’m looking for. This would require some adaptation (for instance, the Wikimedia Israel rubric is premised solely on writing, rather than editing, articles), but it’s a good start. John On 2016-10-08, 9:00 AM, "Education on behalf of [email protected]" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: Send Education mailing list submissions to [email protected] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [email protected] You can reach the person managing the list at [email protected] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Education digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Assessment Rubrics for Wikipedia Assignments (Vahid Masrour) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 17:43:24 -0500 From: Vahid Masrour <[email protected]> To: Wikimedia Education <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Wikimedia Education] Assessment Rubrics for Wikipedia Assignments Message-ID: <cackursfbmhp1mq4phgowx8ej3yh59ty9cenzuy2zb93qh-r...@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Israel has developed quite an advanced model to assess student work in Wikipedia. I recommend you look at their classroom-tested work here: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2b/Article_Assessment_for_Student_Assignments_%E2%80%93_For_Teacher.pdf This guide also written by WMIL may also be of interest (and used as a starting point for your own adaptation?): https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/84/WMIL_-_ A_Guide_to_Writing_Articles_about_Awards_Winning_Scientists.pdf Best regards, Vahid. On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Kleefeld, John <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello all: > > > > I’d like build a catalogue or inventory of assessment (grading) rubrics > for Wikipedia assignments, ranging from the simplest assignments to the > most complex. I’m not referring to a grading structure (10% for this, 50% > for that, etc.), but to a set of objective criteria for assessing the > contributions within that structure. Usually, this will be in a > two-dimensional format with “descriptors” that assess proficiency in > various “dimensions” (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rubric_(academic)), > though other formats are possible. I’ve reviewed various materials, > including the WikiEdu grading page (http://ask.wikiedu.org/ > questions/scope:all/sort:activity-desc/tags:grading/page:1/) and found > some useful guidance at pages 14-19 of the Case Studies document. But I’d > like to see if any of this has been translated into the kinds of rubrics > I’m thinking of. I’m open to seeing what you’ve done in any discipline, > even if it doesn’t follow the format I’m describing. > > > > Apologies for any duplication between this list and the education-request > list. > > > > John Kleefeld > > Associate Professor, College of Law > > University of Saskatchewan > > 15 Campus Drive > > Saskatoon SK S7N 5A6 > > > > tel: (+1) 306.966.1039 > > email: [email protected] > > skype: johnkleefeld > > twitter: @johnkleefeld > > web: http://law.usask.ca/find-people/faculty/kleefeld-john.php > > > > Read my most recent article, co-authored with former student Kate Rattray, > on editing Wikipedia for law school credit: *http://ssrn.com/abstract=2729241 > <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2729241>.* > > > > Also, just published—“Contributory Fault at 90,” my book chapter in Quill > & Friel’s *Damages and Compensation Culture: * > http://www.bloomsbury.com/au/damages-and-compensation- > culture-9781849467971. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Education mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education > > -- Vahid Masrour Community Capacity Manager, Wikipedia Education Program [email protected] https://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/Education -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/education/attachments/20161007/556dd801/attachment-0001.html> ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ Education mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education ------------------------------ End of Education Digest, Vol 65, Issue 2 **************************************** ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ Education mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education ------------------------------ End of Education Digest, Vol 65, Issue 3 **************************************** _______________________________________________ Education mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education
