I would love it if somebody would give some examples of working 2.3 firewall 
rules, and proxy access policies.

The documentation could use some clearing up. Here are a few things I would 
love clarified:

Under Firewall Rules, All policies are read starting from rule 1. If a packet 
matches a rule, the rule is applied (Allowed, Denied, Rejected, etc.) and no 
further rules are processed for that packet. Thus, I can have a rule specifying 
that IP 10.0.0.2 can access the ORANGE interface, but then a rule immediately 
after that that blocks all traffic to ORANGE, blocking all traffic to ORANGE 
except for 10.0.0.2?

Under Proxy -> Access Policy, the same mechanic is true? I have a policy 
allowing unfiltered access to my mail server, followed by a policy that filters 
using the default 'content1' filter. This looks like it works correctly.

Next, I'm not sure why my filtering isn't working like it should: I am in Proxy 
-> Contentfilter -> content1 -> Custom Blacklists. I put 'twitter.com' in 
there... but it isn't blocked.

Also, I have the filtering based on Active Directory and NTLM... which does 
prompt for user names, and the names show up in the logs... but I can connect 
using a user who is _not_ in the group I'm allowing access via the content1 
filter.

Thanks for any information.


--Matt Ross
Ephrata School District


----- Original Message -----
From: jonas kellens
[mailto:jonas.kell...@telenet.be]
To: efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent:
Wed, 30 Dec 2009 02:27:30 -0800
Subject: Re: [Efw-user] firewall rules are
hard to use


> Pedro,
> 
> This is the right configuration for port forwarding to a LAN-client :
> 
> Access from : any
> Target : <any Uplink>
> Port :TCP 51413
> Translate to IP 192.168.1.25  port 51413 
> 
> 
> "Access from : RED" does not work. I don't understand why. Do you ?
> "Target : GREEN" or "Target : 192.168.1.25" does not work. I don't
> understand why I can't use my LAN-client as target, as this is the
> client to where to portforward ?!
> 
> Even with a good understanding of IPtables, I don't get this 'acces',
> 'target' and 'source'.
> 
> Can you maybe post a link to some examples cause I feel that the
> documentation of Endian lacks some explanatory examples.
> 
> 
> Jonas.
> 
> 
> On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 10:12 +0000, Pedro M. S. Oliveira wrote:
> 
> > Hi
> > I disagree on you both about the new EFW firewall interface, I see it
> > much more complete and feature rich than the previous one. This new
> > interface has more advanced options that you may use and it reseable
> > best the iptables capabilities. In my opinion this is the way to go
> > and it will be the difference between an home router and a business
> > system.
> > im sure that with a bit of reading about firewall and the way they
> > work you ll get there.
> > cheers,
> > pedro
> 
> 
> 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
Efw-user mailing list
Efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/efw-user

Reply via email to