Hey, Im new to efw,so far, its great, ofcourse a few things here and there that just drives me nuts, like smtp proxy and the need for more than a p4 if you want active http proxy. Anyways, so far, the fw rules are a bit difficult, but one thing i do like is i can choose the particular uplink, or the ip on that uplink or the entire zone.
So if the new gui is being worked on, please dont drop this. Its helpful for a multihomed environment. Or one with multiple ips. I havw never used 2.2, so there isnt anything for me to compare it ti, so cant comment on that. ----- Regards, Satish Alwani ------- Original message ------- > From: Marco Aurélio <maure...@spin.com.br> > To: efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net > Sent: 8.1.'10, 4:49 > > Hi Christian, > > You know how long it will take for this update will be available? > > Regards, > MA > > > -----Mensagem original----- > De: Christian Graffer [mailto:christ...@endian.com] > Enviada em: quinta-feira, 7 de janeiro de 2010 17:35 > Para: efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net > Assunto: Re: [Efw-user] firewall rules are hard to use > > Hello everybody, > > I would just like to let everybody know that we know about this issue > and we are currently working on a re-design of the Destination NAT GUI. > There will be a simple and an advanced mode. Simple mode will be enough > for normal port forwarding rules whereas advanced mode will be a > re-structured version of the current interface. > > Kind regards, > Christian > > > oneforall immortal wrote: >> HI >> I wish there was a nice bug page for users setup. Becaus the eamil is >> so hard to use and see responses etc. >> But anyway I asked a while ago and witht his email system it so darn >> hard too find out if therer was any answers. I find and have seen others >> too having trouble getting things that used to be easier to setup and >> now are way to hard or like myself just give up trying. I can't figure >> out howto have the addresses/web pages bypass the proxy like it was done >> in 2.2 mush easier, becaude I never had to ask. Also on my box with >> apche running I used to be able to on that same box put in the domain >> anme and it worked. But now it only work using localhost:81/ . Thats no >> good for testing and frustrating also to figure out with out success:( >> Some new features are nice but when thing that used to work much easier >> are to hard to even figure out its diapionting :( > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community > Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support > A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy > Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers > http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Efw-user mailing list > Efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/efw-user > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community > Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support > A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy > Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers > http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Efw-user mailing list > Efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/efw-user ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Efw-user mailing list Efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/efw-user
