"Miles Lott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:

>The fact that this work appears to be essentially funded by a single
>company worries me, as I am very suspicious of their motives.  Even if
>these developers have only the best intentions, they cannot really know
>what their company will do in the future as far as code ownership,
>alliances with larger corporations or governments, etc.  I would rather
>that the project not be subject to the whim of their employer, or any other
>single entity which is not built specifically and only to promote and
>protect the egroupware project.  I hope everyone will at least think about
>this as we move forward.
>
What would that change? GPL stays GPL. Regardless what happens with us, the
license of the released code will not change.

And how would that change the current situation. Currently eGroupWare is
driven by only one developer. Nothing happend at the core of eGroupWare
since Ralf is on vacation. Who takes care of eTemplate if Ralf decides todo
something else. "I would rather that the project not be subject to the whim
of Ralf, or any other single entity which is not built specifically and
only to promote and protect the egroupware project.  I hope everyone will
at least think about this as we move forward."

> In summary, if you have no respect for the admins, or their statements as
>made within and as an extension of the constitution of this project, then
>you have no respect for the constitution itself, regardless of who the
>admins are.  This means that you have no respect for the project, as the
>constitution is the organizing document for the project.  If you want to
>change it, then there are procedures set forth for this purpose. 
>Otherwise, you must respect these rules if you wish to continue to remain
>as members of the project.  You accepted the admin statement on or around
>12-18-2007.  Your acceptance is, however, not required.  The fact is that
>the statement has been made and is now part of our organizing principles. 
>I feel that the methods used so far are inline with that concept, as agreed
>upon by all voting members several years ago.  You can create your own
>rules, if you wish.  But, you will not do it here.
>
I stated very clearly. why I don't have any respect for you as admins
anymore. Respect is mutual. 

Cornelius and me are projectmembers too. I also elected you as admin. But
if you don't care about me, why should I care about you?

The Nigel Vickers case is still undecided since at least 2 months.
We still don't have a list of projectmembers since at least 3 weeks.
Non projectmembers post to the core list and no admin takes care about it.


--
Lars Kneschke
CTO OfficeSpot.Net
Metaways Infosystems GmbH
Pickhuben 2-4, D-20457 Hamburg

eGroupWare Support: http://www.egroupware-support.net
OfficeSpot.Net Collaboration Server: http://cs.officespot.net
our proposal for the next major eGroupWare release: http://www.tine20.org

E-Mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://www.metaways.de
Tel: +49 (0)40 317031-21
Fax: +49 (0)40 317031-921
Mobile: +49 (0)175 9304324

Metaways Infosystems GmbH - Sitz: D-22967 Tremsbüttel
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Ahrensburg HRB 4508
Geschäftsführung: Hermann Thaele, Lüder-H.Thaele

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
eGroupWare-core mailing list
eGroupWare-core@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/egroupware-core

Reply via email to