| Ron Yust wrote:
|
|  > Wow!  No static methods/data, no file i/o, no threads, no sockets, no
native
|  > code.  Sounds like EJB is an unruly teenager about to take the family
car
|  > out on a date.  Geeesh, just neuter the EJB application!  I may end up
|  > sticking with my trusty old RMI server.
|
| Sounds pretty bleak, doesn't it?  I think it shows the relative
| immaturity of the EJB/J2EE architecture.

hi!

Regarding the singleton issue, I think there should be a hybrid EJBean
type: something that can be shared like an entity even between different
JVMs, stays alive after passivations like a stateful session bean (or
possibly
make it stay in memory as long as xxx specific method is not called, also
we may achive performance since it's always in-memory).
We may call it SingletonBean!!
I think it shouldn't be that hard to implement it...

Ara Abrahamian
bi!

===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".

Reply via email to