Assaf Arkin wrote:
> I think Marc pointed out that the resource problem has to do with the
> remote reference, not the bean instance itself. I tend to agree.
Yes, that was the focus of my messages.
> Remote interfaces do have a penalty, unlike handles which can be
> resolved to a newly created remote interface on demand. To get around
> this penalty the server should not attempt to kill the remote interfaces
> (and certainly not the bean instance), but allow multiple clients to use
> the same remote interface.
My point was too fine, I think. I was just trying to say that a server,
acting on behalf of its resource-conscious administrator, ought to have
the right to discard resources it has been told or it has determined
are out of date. What constitutes "out of date" is the controversy.
Marc San Soucie
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
