James Cook wrote:
> I guess the real question involves the server-side EJBObjects. Marc was
> stating that Gemstone (correct me if I'm wrong) destroys these resources
> after a suitable timeout period.
I was stating that an EJB server, on request from an administrator
using a technique such as a configurable timeout, should be able to
eliminate client-specific artifacts that are "out of date". Some
folks interpret the EJB spec to say that client references to
stateless session beans are never "out of date". The spec doesn't
say this, but it's certainly one possible interpretation.
Marc San Soucie
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
