Constantine Plotnikov wrote:
> I wonder about exeptions. EJB require at least RemoteException
> to be declared. There are no checked exceptions in JavaBeans patterns
> except for constrained propereties. But JavaBeans patterns for
> accessor methods still applicable with minor adaptation.
EJB does not require beans to throw RemoteExceptions. And even if they
did this would probably not be a problem since most JavaBean customizers
use reflection in which case checked exceptions is not a problem.
> JavaBeans Event model require support from tools, because client
> have access only to EJB Object. I think that JMS better fits EJB
> as event model then something like to what was done in CORBA
> Component Object Model.
The original suggestions was to use the JavaBeans design time facilities
for configuration, not the runtime features such as events (which of
course wouldn't work).
/Rickard
--
Rickard �berg
Computer Science student@LiTH
@home: +46 13 177937
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://www-und.ida.liu.se/~ricob684
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
