Hey "Bailey, Jeff" wrote: > I'm not too crazy about the idea of publishing the type of EJB in the remote > interface and home names. I view CMP vs. BMP as an implementation detail > that users of my EJB don't know or care about. For example, I could change > from CMP to BMP and my client code should care less. Yup, definitely agree. Should be no difference whatsoever for the client. /Rickard -- Rickard �berg @home: +46 13 177937 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www-und.ida.liu.se/~ricob684 =========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
- EJB naming conventions? Rickard �berg
- Re: EJB naming conventions? Victor Langelo
- Re: EJB naming conventions? Jon Tirsen
- Re: EJB naming conventions? John Archer
- Re: EJB naming conventions? Chuck McCorvey
- Re: EJB naming conventions? Rickard �berg
- Re: EJB naming conventions? Jon Tirsen
- Re: EJB naming conventions? Rickard �berg
- Re: EJB naming conventions? Bailey, Jeff
- Re: EJB naming conventions? Rickard �berg
- Re: EJB naming conventions? Jon Tirsen
- Re: EJB naming conventions? Rickard �berg
- Re: EJB naming conventions? Nigel Charman
- Re: EJB naming conventions? Javier Borrajo
- Re: EJB naming conventions? Karl-Fredrik Blixt
- Re: EJB naming conventions? Chuck McCorvey
- Re: EJB naming conventions? Wei Jiang
- Re: EJB naming conventions? Rickard �berg
- Re: EJB naming conventions? James Cook
- Re: EJB naming conventions? Javier Borrajo
