I see the beginnings of a religious debate here. This is purely a matter of
personal choice.
jim
----- Original Message -----
From: Rickard �berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 1999 9:49 AM
Subject: Re: EJB naming conventions?
Hey
Wei Jiang wrote:
> When we are talking a business entity, a person,
> we have a logic class Person, which has methods
> *and* *data*.
>
> EJB put Entity Bean in a container, as a prisoner
> with life sentence. So you can not realy have a
> stand-a-lone Person class. You only have an interface
> to access it. So there is no conflict between
> Person and IPerson.
Exactly. And since you'll never, in your case, see Person why not rename
IPerson to Person? It's shorter, and the "I" doesn't really add
anything.
/Rickard
--
Rickard �berg
@home: +46 13 177937
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://www-und.ida.liu.se/~ricob684
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
