Do it.  RMI is the correct answer for many applications.  It has less overhead, and 
allows the designer to do anything.
However, RMI does not provide security, transaction control, caching, or isolation 
like the EJB container.

Always use the tool that meets the requirements of the job.

Don't use EJB just because your management says it is hot.


-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Yust [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 1999 2:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: EJB Restrictions-- threads, io


Paul,

Wow!  No static methods/data, no file i/o, no threads, no sockets, no native
code.  Sounds like EJB is an unruly teenager about to take the family car
out on a date.  Geeesh, just neuter the EJB application!  I may end up
sticking with my trusty old RMI server.

-Ron

===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".

Reply via email to