Hey
Ron Yust wrote:
> You misunderstood my question. I know why an EJB server is better than a
> RMI server. My question was highlighting the silliness of designing an
> application that has to use both to get a job done. I want to just use EJB
> only, but if I have to have a RMI server next to it, well, why don't just do
> it all in RMI then. Don't want to, but I'm beginning to complicate things
> by going outside EJB anyway.
Ok. Well, EJB gives you things that you don't get with plain RMI. But if
you have to use RMI to solve your problem, then do so. And if you for
some reason find that EJB doesn't solve enough of your problem, then
don't use it.
I'm not sure how to give a better answer than that...
/Rickard
--
Rickard �berg
@home: +46 13 177937
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://www-und.ida.liu.se/~ricob684
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
