"Andy L. Czerwonka" wrote:
>
> It's trivial to design such an interface. The argument is that EJB doesn't
> use the power of interfaces to enforce the signature in the bean class.
That's all very well, but if an EJB server lets you get away with not defining
some methods that are part of the remote interface, you might want to ask the
vendor to fix that problem (the spec might not require it, but that doesn't
mean that responsible vendors shouldn't ensure this is checked for anyway).
________________________________________________________________________________
Evan Ireland Sybase EA Server Engineering [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wellington - New Zealand +64 4 934-5856
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
