Rickard wrote:
> > Interfaces is a means to define a contract. If you ignore that
> contract
> > by throwing RemoteExceptions which wrap other exceptions you don't
> gain
> > any extra information from the interface (as far as exceptions are
> > concerned).
> > Why would you want to have such a design/implementation??
>
> Possibly so that the bean class could be extended (extra exceptions
> thrown)
> wihout having to re-deploy client-side EJBObject stubs to retain the
> contract?
>
> conor.
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".