> Hi
>
> Rickard wrote:
>
> > You do not need to do activation/passivation all the time, which are
> > potentially very costly operations. I have a bean which
> does ALOT (and I
> > mean loads) of stuff during ejbActivate and ejbPassivate. My whole
> > system would crumble if the bean was passivated after each
> transaction.
> > Thank god it is not ;-)
>
> So does this mean your code is not portable or will die a slow death
> because other EJB Server vendors have interpreted the EJB
> specification
> differently? Doesn't this mean that the EJB specification should be
> changed so that such behaviour can be controlled by us through a
> standard API which all vendors support consistently?
>
> Geoff
You just found a major problem of the EJB spec. It leaves too much room
for guessing.
Bye,
Michael
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
