Yes, but those apis are useless if the underlying resource can't do a
prepare, commit and rollback!
-Chris.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Assaf Arkin [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, December 10, 1999 2:04 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: BMP with LDAP
>
> There are three APIs that allow you do make your resource transactional
> aware and get it running in the context of a global transaction:
> org.omg.CosTransactions.Resource (JTS/OTS),
> javax.transactions.xa.XAResource (JTA), and
> javax.transaction.Synchronization (no two-phase commit).
>
> The only thing you need is a way to tell the transaction manager to
> place this resource inside the transaction, and there is no API to get
> that done. I expect the connector architecture to provide something like
> that, or at least define some way to configure it.
>
> arkin
>
>
> > Erik Huddleston wrote:
> >
> > Microsoft's suite of middleware technologies is introducing the
> > concept of a compensating resource managers (if COM+ ever ships).
> > Basically, you create a component that implements a couple of
> > interfaces. One interface is used to integrate with OLE Transactions
> > (the equivalent of JTS) and vote on the outcome of transactions. The
> > other interface is used to allow notification of the outcome of a
> > transaction (including a durable log). That allows the non
> > transactional resource to issue a compensating action for any rolled
> > back transaction.
> >
> > Does anyone who is following the EJB standards process know if we are
> > going to get functionality like this any time soon. It sounds like
> > the connector architecture is a first step and would provide a
> > convenient place to house such functionality.
> >
> > Erik
> > --
> > Erik Huddleston, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Chief Architect, eCustomers.com
> > Microsoft Java MVP
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Kirk Pepperdine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Friday, December 10, 1999 6:27 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: BMP with LDAP
> > >
> > >
> > > >Confirmed. You can get an LDAP JNDI SPI from either JavaSoft (look
> > in
> > > >the JNDI page) or Netscape (the Mozilla Directory SDK).
> > > >
> > > >That still does not make LDAP transactional, but I don't see why
> > you
> > > >couldn't use LDAP for persistance. After all if you are
> > > updating LDAP,
> > > >whether through the LDAP API, JNDI or BMP you get the same
> > > >non-transactional persistance.
> > >
> > > [Kirk] What happens when the LDAP is involved in a
> > > distributed transaction
> > > that gets rolled back?
> > >
> > > >
> > > >arkin
> > >
> > > ==============================================================
> > > =============
> > > To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> > > include in the body
> > > of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help,
> > > send email to
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
> >
> > >
>
> --
> ____________________________________________________________
> Assaf Arkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CTO http://www.exoffice.com
> Exoffice, The ExoLab Company tel: (650) 259-9796
>
> ==========================================================================
> =
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the
> body
> of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
