Sorry people,
next time I'll use the tags
<rhetorical
/rhetorical>
before sending comments like this again.
As LDAP is not transactional, it didn't appear to be an appropriate
technology for the originators problem.
Kirk
-----Original Message-----
From: Rickard �berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, December 10, 1999 5:02 PM
Subject: Re: BMP with LDAP
Hi!
Kirk Pepperdine wrote:
> >Confirmed. You can get an LDAP JNDI SPI from either JavaSoft (look in
> >the JNDI page) or Netscape (the Mozilla Directory SDK).
> >
> >That still does not make LDAP transactional, but I don't see why you
> >couldn't use LDAP for persistance. After all if you are updating LDAP,
> >whether through the LDAP API, JNDI or BMP you get the same
> >non-transactional persistance.
>
> [Kirk] What happens when the LDAP is involved in a distributed transaction
> that gets rolled back?
Nothing, since the LDAP server isn't transactional..
It would be possible to build a JNDI provider on top of EJB for example,
which would make it transactional. Anyone who have tried? Would be very
useful to have.
/Rickard
--
Rickard �berg
@home: +46 13 177937
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://www-und.ida.liu.se/~ricob684
Question reality
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
