Sriram Srinivasan wrote:
>
> Because we do take the entire customer experience seriously. We offer
> helpful support to everyone, whether it is an evaluator or a competitor.
> The product has a whole range of tremendously useful functionality, J2EE
> support being just one part of it. We support clustering, replicated HTTP
> sessions, global naming service over multicast, transparent COM integration.
> We run TENS of THOUSANDS of tests EVERY NIGHT. Tests include
> various combinations of JVMs, java compilers, hardware platforms,
> operating systems (NT, Solaris, Aix, HP), green vs. native threads, JIT
> vs. non-JIT, etc. Sanity tests are run automatically the moment someone
> checks a piece of code in. When bugs are found in the field, we provide
> fixes in record time.
I've pointed out a bug in your product regarding the use of
java.lang.Long as a primary key, yet no one has provided a fix. Many
workarounds have been suggested, but the cause of the problem has yet to
be solved. See case numbers 150982 and 150916.
>
> Perhaps that explains why we have never lost an account to any of our
> competitors on technical reasons alone.
>
We are going to be using Gemstone/J instead of your product after a 6
month technical evaluation proved that Gemstone/J was the superior
server. I would not make such broad statements unless you are entirely
sure that they are true.
- TK
> We firmly believe that our product has the best performance on the planet,
> so we are definitely keen to hear the details of your test. What
> kind of a test did you do? How many clients? What was the deployment descriptor
>
> like? Did you measure scaleability and stability as numbers of clients and
> beans
> were upped?
>
> -Sriram
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
