Re: Threads question

[Laird Nelson]

Eric Williams wrote:
> And the EJB specification writers had to enable vendors to offer
> advanced
> products based on the specification (eg, EJB implemented *in* a
> database, or a
> multi-VM shared-memory approach, etc.)... some of which are incompatible
> with
> threads or file I/O.

Something here bothered me and I just got it: if java.lang.Thread is
part of the core Java language (as implemented by every VM, including
Oracle's "advanced product" in-database VM), then how could you have an
"advanced product" that is incompatible with it?

Cheers,
Laird

===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".