Evan Ireland wrote:
> And let's all hope that when such a beast exists, it will not require the use
> of valuetypes or serialized Java objects in the service context list!!!

See, another great argument for my case. No matter how RMI/IIOP decides
to do it, the solution may not be good for all. With the solution I (and
BEA, and others) have proposed, this would not be a problem.

/Rickard

--
Rickard �berg

@home: +46 13 177937
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dreambean.com
Question reality

===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".

Reply via email to