Evan Ireland wrote: > And let's all hope that when such a beast exists, it will not require the use > of valuetypes or serialized Java objects in the service context list!!! See, another great argument for my case. No matter how RMI/IIOP decides to do it, the solution may not be good for all. With the solution I (and BEA, and others) have proposed, this would not be a problem. /Rickard -- Rickard �berg @home: +46 13 177937 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dreambean.com Question reality =========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
- Re: Does IIOP Matter !!! READ THIS !!!!!!!!!!! Rickard �berg
- Re: Does IIOP Matter !!! READ THIS !!!!!!!!!!! Rickard �berg
- Re: Does IIOP Matter !!! READ THIS !!!!!!!!!!! Rickard �berg
- Re: Does IIOP Matter !!! READ THIS !!!!!!!!!!! Matt Kleiderman
- Re: Does IIOP Matter !!! READ THIS !!!!!!!!!!! Rickard �berg
- Re: Does IIOP Matter !!! READ THIS !!!!!!!!!!! Rickard �berg
- Re: Does IIOP Matter !!! READ THIS !!!!!!!!!!! Rickard �berg
- Re: Does IIOP Matter !!! READ THIS !!!!!!!!!!! Richard Monson-Haefel
- Re: Does IIOP Matter !!! READ THIS !!!!!!!!!!! Rickard �berg
- Re: Does IIOP Matter !!! READ THIS !!!!!!!!!!! Rickard �berg
- Re: Does IIOP Matter !!! READ THIS !!!!!!!!!!! Bhattacharyya, Ana
- Re: Does IIOP Matter !!! READ THIS !!!!!!!!!!! Rickard �berg
- Re: Does IIOP Matter !!! READ THIS !!!!!!!!!!! Dan OConnor
- Re: Does IIOP Matter !!! READ THIS !!!!!!!!!!! Eric Williams
- Re: Does IIOP Matter !!! READ THIS !!!!!!!!!!! Robert Isepin
- Re: Does IIOP Matter !!! READ THIS !!!!!!!!!!! Dan OConnor
- Re: Does IIOP Matter !!! READ THIS !!!!!!!!!!! Richard Monson-Haefel
- Re: Does IIOP Matter !!! READ THIS !!!!!!!!... Dan OConnor
- Re: Does IIOP Matter !!! READ THIS !!!!... Richard Monson-Haefel
