thank you for the info Chris.

you mention Stateless Session beans.  Were there Stateful Session Beans and
Entity Beans as well?


Rob Jago
Programmer/Designer
Ottawa


-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Raber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: April 14, 2000 1:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Largest EJB Implementation ?


I don't have tons of data, but here are a few data points:

- NetScape WEB servers
- Stateless Session  Beans
- Oracle database
- 15 million hits per week
- 140,000 users
- 150,000 shipments per day

Take this with a grain of salt, I am copying it from a mktg presentation on
this account. It gives us an idea of the scale of the thing though. It's
pretty darn big.

They run on Sun hardware. Not sure what models, but I believe they are
mid-range servers.

-Chris.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jago, Robert [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, April 14, 2000 10:53 AM
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:      Re: Largest EJB Implementation ?
>
> Hello Chris.
>
>         Do there exist actual numbers of performance, throughput, peak
> load
> numbers for this?
>         Not to mention infrastructure?
>
> Rob Jago
> Programmer/Designer
> Ottawa
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Raber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: April 14, 2000 10:28 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Largest EJB Implementation ?
>
>
> <vendor>
> Ingram Micro's auction site is built on EJB (GemStone).
>
> It does zillions of hits per time unit bla bla bla... And the hits do go
> through beans!
> </vendor>
>
> -Chris.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Eddie Fung [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2000 6:27 PM
> > To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject:      Largest EJB Implementation ?
> >
> > Anyone know what the largest production EJB implementation is out there
> > (subject to non disclosure agreements of course) ?
> >
> > 'Largest' in terms of a mix of :
> > - transaction volume
> > - complexity (EJB side, not servlet/client side) ie. 'depth of logic'
> > - database volumes
> >
> > I'm not interested in apps that have a million hits/minute with very
> > little EJB (or at least simple) activity. That's high TP but not 'deep'.
> >
> > When you read the literature and the J2EE Blueprint it is always very
> > simplistic and I was interested in the current state of affairs - EJB
> > still being 'bleeding' edge so to speak.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > Eddie
> >
> >
> ==========================================================================
> > =
> > To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the
> > body
> > of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For general help, send email to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
>
> ==========================================================================
> =
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the
> body
> of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For general help, send email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
>
> ==========================================================================
> =
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the
> body
> of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For general help, send email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".

===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".

===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".

Reply via email to