Robert Castaneda wrote: > > A combination can be used: > > One could easily write Stateful beans as clients to the Stateless beans to > be used for WAP and thin client apps, and stateful clients with Stateless > Beans for transaction heavy use for scalability reasons That would result in different facades for different clients. IMHO this would cause a somewhat confusing architecture, and in that case I would prefer to have the WAP servlet keep the session for itself. /Marcus Marcus Ahnve Sun Java Center Sweden =========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
- Re: Largest EJB Implementation ? Dan OConnor
- Re: Largest EJB Implementation ? Chris Raber
- Re: Largest EJB Implementation ? Chris Raber
- Re: Largest EJB Implementation ? Randy Stafford
- Re: Largest EJB Implementation ? Marcus Ahnve
- Re: Largest EJB Implementation ? Bhattacharyya, Ana
- Re: Largest EJB Implementation ? Dan OConnor
- Re: Largest EJB Implementation ? thomas udo
- Re: Largest EJB Implementation ? Tom Udo
- Re: Largest EJB Implementation ? Robert Castaneda
- Re: Largest EJB Implementation ? Marcus Ahnve
- Re: Largest EJB Implementation ? Robert Castaneda
- Re: Largest EJB Implementation ? Marcus Ahnve
- Re: Largest EJB Implementation ? Jon Tirs�n
- Re: Largest EJB Implementation ? Jon Tirs�n
- Re: Largest EJB Implementation ? Robert Castaneda
- Re: Largest EJB Implementation ? Louth, William (Exchange)
- Re: Largest EJB Implementation ? Dan OConnor
- Re: Largest EJB Implementation ? Louth, William (Exchange)
- Re: Largest EJB Implementation ? Chris Raber
- Re: Largest EJB Implementation ? Bhattacharyya, Ana
