"J. Matthew Pryor" wrote: > Just a bit of a pain I guess. Right; there were many of us who thought that RemoteException at the time of its design should have inherited from RuntimeException for precisely this kind of reason. Cheers, Laird =========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
- MI2: Strategies to reduce EJB development time? Humphrey Sheil
- Re: MI2: Strategies to reduce EJB developme... Victor Langelo
- Re: MI2: Strategies to reduce EJB developme... Chaganthi, Madhusudan R.
- Re: MI2: Strategies to reduce EJB developme... Chris Raber
- Re: MI2: Strategies to reduce EJB devel... Tim Endres
- Re: MI2: Strategies to reduce EJB d... Robert Krueger
- Re: MI2: Strategies to reduce EJB developme... Chris Raber
- Re: MI2: Strategies to reduce EJB devel... J. Matthew Pryor
- Re: MI2: Strategies to reduce EJB d... Laird Nelson
- Re: MI2: Strategies to reduce E... J. Matthew Pryor
- Re: MI2: Strategies to reduce EJB d... J. Matthew Pryor
- Re: MI2: Strategies to reduce EJB developme... Scott Stirling
- Re: MI2: Strategies to reduce EJB developme... Brent Trimmer
- Re: MI2: Strategies to reduce EJB devel... J. Matthew Pryor
- Re: MI2: Strategies to reduce EJB developme... U . Gohde
