I'm addressing the point Rickard skipped :

> From: A mailing list for Enterprise JavaBeans development
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of dan benanav

> 3)  I am unclear about stateful beans using weblogic clustering.

<vendor>

Stateful session beans are now replicated (in-memory) in Weblogic. The
implementation is available in our current EJB 2.0 beta and will be included
in our next release.

</vendor>

> The bottom line is that when you design your system for weblogic you
> should be thinking about clustering up front.

On a more general note, there is only so far that transparency will take you.
The "Note on distributing computing" by Waldo et al. paper clearly explains
why sometimes, transparency is not good for you (or simply cannot be
achieved). There are things that you need to be aware of when you are making a
remote call, and the same reasoning should be applied to a clustered
application.

Granted, the application server can alleviate a lot of this burden with
techniques such as smart stubs, but that's just plumbing detail and it only
represents a part of the picture. You are working at a higher level and
ultimately, your design has to take clustering into account.

> I would like to see a discussion and comparison of how other ejb servers
> handle clustering.

Looking forward to it.

--
Cedric

===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".

Reply via email to