I think Frank might be looking for

"A Note on Distributed Computing"
Author(s):
Samuel C. Kendall, Jim Waldo, Ann Wollrath and Geoff Wyant

I'd actually just forwarded this to a group of colleagues. It's
a great paper and still relevant despite being published before
Corba became mainstream, and before the internet.

http://www.sun.com/research/techrep/1994/abstract-29.html


Peter

----- Original Message -----
From: "dan benanav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2000 8:01 AM
Subject: Re: Clustering: detailed comparison and survey


> Frank,
>
> I have heard about Gemstone's approach to clustering, but haven't used it
> myself.  Thanks for your feedback.   Are you using clustering in
production?
>
> Frank Sauer wrote:
>
> > First off, I Don't work for Gemstone, but I really think you should
> > read the whitepapers on extreme clustering available at
> > http://www.gemstone.com
> > You'll see that clustering (and load balancing and high availability and
> > failover) can ALL be achieved TRANSPARENTLY simply because of their
> > architecture
> > based on multiple managed server VMs accessing shared memory which is
> > replicated
> > to multiple machines (overly simplified, but this is what it boils down
to).
> >
> > It's all in the architecture and given the elegance of this approach
(and
> > the success
> > we've had with it) I simply don't see what all the fuss is about with
> > regards to
> > clustering. We simply never had to worry about it because the
application
> > server
> > is properly architected and takes care of all the scalability issues.
> >
> > I would like to read that paper by Waldo et al. Perhaps I'm missing
> > something and it
> > can set me straight... Is it available online somewhere?
> >
> > Frank Sauer
> > The technical Resource Connection
> > a wholly owned subsidiary of Perot Systems
> > Tampa, FL
> > http://www.trcinc.com
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: A mailing list for Enterprise JavaBeans development
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Cedric Beust
> > > Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 3:17 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: Clustering: detailed comparison and survey
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm addressing the point Rickard skipped :
> > >
> > > > From: A mailing list for Enterprise JavaBeans development
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of dan benanav
> > >
> > > > 3)  I am unclear about stateful beans using weblogic clustering.
> > >
> > > <vendor>
> > >
> > > Stateful session beans are now replicated (in-memory) in Weblogic. The
> > > implementation is available in our current EJB 2.0 beta and
> > > will be included
> > > in our next release.
> > >
> > > </vendor>
> > >
> > > > The bottom line is that when you design your system for weblogic you
> > > > should be thinking about clustering up front.
> > >
> > > On a more general note, there is only so far that
> > > transparency will take you.
> > > The "Note on distributing computing" by Waldo et al. paper
> > > clearly explains
> > > why sometimes, transparency is not good for you (or simply cannot be
> > > achieved). There are things that you need to be aware of when
> > > you are making a
> > > remote call, and the same reasoning should be applied to a clustered
> > > application.
> > >
> > > Granted, the application server can alleviate a lot of this
> > > burden with
> > > techniques such as smart stubs, but that's just plumbing
> > > detail and it only
> > > represents a part of the picture. You are working at a higher
> > > level and
> > > ultimately, your design has to take clustering into account.
> > >
> > > > I would like to see a discussion and comparison of how
> > > other ejb servers
> > > > handle clustering.
> > >
> > > Looking forward to it.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Cedric
> > >
> > > ==============================================================
> > > =============
> > > To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> > > include in the body
> > > of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For general help,
> > > send email to
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
> > >
> >
> >
===========================================================================
> > To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the
body
> > of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For general help, send email to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
>
>
===========================================================================
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the
body
> of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For general help, send email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
>

===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".

Reply via email to