Hi Cedric and thanks for the reply!
--On Monday, October 02, 2000 11:37 AM -0700 Cedric Beust
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, no. It used to be so, but this part of the specification has
> been revised in the latest version. By default, the deletion of a
> dependent object will not trickle down to other objects that have a
> relationship with it, unless you have specified "cascade-delete" in its
> deployment descriptor. Section 9.4.4.2 explains this in details.
Ah! OK, thanks very much. I grabbed the latest spec and read this.
But I think I didn't describe my question too well. My understanding of a
"dependant object" was that it is not an actual entity bean but instead is
a concrete class with no remote interface exposed to the client.
I am more concerned about relationships between actual entity beans. I have
read the spec again (in particular section 9.5.3.2) and that seems to imply
that entity beans can have one-to-many relationships managed in CMP. In
particular, I am trying to figure out if one-to-one, one-to-many and
many-to-many relationships can be supported between entity beans using CMP
in EJB 2.0.
What do you think?
Thanks again...
Jim
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
