Cedric Beust wrote:
>
> > From: A mailing list for Enterprise JavaBeans development
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jonathan Weedon
>
> > I look at things a little differently. To me, the limitations in the
> <snip>
>
> While I agree with all the points you make about the danger there is in a bean
> doing I/O (especially in clusters), I still have a little spark deep down
> inside my stomach that whispers "leave it up to the developer".
>
> In a nutshell, the idea is: make the spirit of the EJB spec clear to bean
> providers (and you certainly did a good job at that) *but* give them all
> freedom to go to the metal if they so desire.
>
> --
> Cedric
> who has probably spent too much time around C++, in case it didn't show
Cedric,
I agree 100%. Our server does not (currently) enforce these rules, and if
it ever does then there will absolutely be a way for the user to disable
the checks.
Absolutely: pedal to the metal, if you can take the speed ;-)
-jkw
who has absolutely spent too much time around C++, having written two full
CORBA implementations in C++, among other things, before giving up and
moving first to CLOS, and then to Java...
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
