I prefer to use a mixture of JAR and EAR

I like to use one JAR for each bean.  Then for each system I write, I can
combine these JAR's into an EAR file for deployment.  In this way I have a
modular design where I can bundle JARs into EAR in any order I need.

If the DD is properly created it should be fully portable.  I reccomend
using the J2EE verifier program to be sure your vendor isnt adding
proprietary info into the DD.

<vendor>

I can say for Sybase we put no proprietary info into the DD.  We should
accept any legal DD.

</vendor>

Dave Wolf
Internet Applications Division
Sybase

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kenneth D. Litwak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 1:00 PM
Subject: EJB packaging


>    What are the releative mertis of the two following approaches:
>
>    1.  Create an application, with one ejb-jar file which contains
multiple
> EJBs.
>
>    2.  Create an application which has multiple ejb-jar files, oen for
each
> EJB in the application?
>
>
>    While speaking of packaging, I was under the impression that a
deployment
> descriptor should be portable across servers, including vendors.  Yet,
I've
> been told taht the DD for, say, Webloic, is very different from the DD for
> Websphere.  What kindof portability are DDs supposed to have?   Thanks.
>
>
>    Ken
>
>
===========================================================================
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the
body
> of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For general help, send email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
>
>

===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".

Reply via email to