Cedric Beust wrote:
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Victor Langelo
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 2:54 PM
>
> > This would only be true if BAR.equals(FOO).
> > There is nothing I see in the spec that prohibits the server from responding to
> > findByPrimaryKey without calling bean.ejbFindByPrimaryKey.
>
> Aren't these two statements contradictory?
>
> I think the first one is incorrect and that you are indeed free to implement
> findByPrimaryKey() whatever way you find appropriate as long as you return an EO
> (or a PK if you're on the bean).
>
> And to answer the initial request, and as correctly stated by Jean-Baptiste, you
> only get the illusion that you are talking to a Singleton: the server is free to
> service your request with different bean instances each time, possibly living on
> different JVM's in a clustered environment (and by the way, Jean-Baptiste, WLS
> does support this).
>
Cool. Unfortunately, I haven't had the time to look at WLS for some time. At the time
I evaluated WLS, it didn't support this (AFAIK), but WLS seems to get cooler and
cooler, and, unlike some other vendors, to go fast towards EJB2.0.
Keep up the good work.
JB.
>
> --
> Cedric
>
> ===========================================================================
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
> of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
--
Jean-Baptiste Nizet
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
R&D Engineer, S1 Belgium
Kleine Kloosterstraat, 23
B-1932 Sint-Stevens Woluwe
+32 2 200 45 42
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
