Robert Kr�ger wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm in favor of eliminating overhead from the container's checking of
> > > transaction and security contexts, but I don't think "Supports" is
> > > appropriate for EJB 2.0 CMP entity beans with local component
> > > interfaces. These must always execute within a transaction (see
> > > e.g. EJB 2.0 PFD2 17.4.1), which "Supports" would not ensure.
> >
> > You are absolutely correct. I'll change my proposal to "Mandatory". This
> > then requires that there be some checking for context, which is fast and
> > can be avoided with pre-compiling, but it makes sense to require that a
> > transaction be present.
>
> meaning that you would require SessionBean local interfaces to be executed in
> a transaction context which doesn't make sense or do you mean only local
> interfaces for entity beans (you didn't explicitly mention that)?
I'm only talking about Entity beans.
--
Richard Monson-Haefel
Author of Enterprise JavaBeans, 2nd Edition (O'Reilly 2000)
Co-Author of Java Message Service (O'Reilly 2000)
http://www.jMiddleware.com
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
