Jonathan K. Weedon wrote:
> In general, I question the user benefit of BEA recommending their current
> EJB 2.0 implemenation to customers. Do they really feel that
> customers like to rewrite their applications so frequently?
We're not recommending anything, but merely offering a choice: it's up to
our customers to choose EJB 1.1 or 2.0, and they know the risks of
developing against a non-final specification. However, I truly believe that
those who will have experimented with the EJB 2.0 preview will have a big
headstart when their company decides to switch over to EJB 2.0 after the
specification has been finalized.
John Harby wrote:
> Isn't Weblogic 6 "decoupled" in the sense that the EJB2.0 is in a separate
> jar and you can use WL 6.0 without these deprecated features?
That was for our preview of last year (June 2000). Our current container
implements both EJB 1.1 and EJB 2.0 as of PFD2, but if you deploy EJB 1.1
beans, it's the EJB 1.1 specification that will apply.
--
Cedric
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
