> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan K. Weedon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 20:12
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Finder methods
>
>
> Avi,
>
> Thinking about this a bit more, I decided what it is I found irksome
> about Cedric's posting. It is not so much the fact that BEA provides
> early access to EJB 2.0 draft specifications. If they want to provide
> this, that's fine. If customers understand the issues involved, and
> want to use it, that's fine.
[snip (justified) attack on weblogic]
You are quite correct, I much disliked being forced to use EJB 2.0 for
reasons not related to EJB 2.0 features.
I did like, though, using the EJB 2.0 preview while I was at it.
Vendors should provide full functionality in their stable releases *and*
supply preview releases.
As it was, I preferred
moving-to-preview-EJB2.0-with-no-guarantees-and-the-spec-may-change-without-
notice-etc to being left out in the cold.
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
