Cedric,
Ignoring the inlined heated product reviews I have still to see a proper
response to the points Jonathan has raised. I would really like to see you
continue this thread and provide a professional and respectable answer.
The claim that Jonathan is insulting customers is in fact an insult to the
people on this mailing list. Just because thousands of customers use a
product does not mean its scalable or fault tolerant. Is this not why we are
here and not somewhere else like .net. Strange that in one of your responses
you sounded just like Microsoft (cue for Larry).
regards
William
-----Original Message-----
From: A mailing list for Enterprise JavaBeans development
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Cedric Beust
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 10:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: To scale or to be correct: that is the question
Jonathan, I was hoping we settled this issue a few months ago on this very
list, but it doesn't seem to be the case.
For some reason that I still don't understand, you seem to enjoy
participating in product bashing,
constant trolling and never missing an opportunity to plug your own product.
This is something I already stated I wasn't interested in taking part in.
So if you want to claim that the thousands of customers we have out there
are using a product that is unscalable or corrupts their database and by the
same token, insulting their skills and intelligence, I'm not going to stop
you, except maybe with technical explanations which you will pretend not to
understand in an effort to stir up more controversy and name calling. My
messages are not meant to convince you, I'm simply hoping the thousands of
readers of this mailing-list are as interested in the technical issues as I
am and will therefore find my explanations interesting.
This will be my last comment on this thread, it will be brief, I already
said everything I had to say in previous messages. If you want to have the
last word, it's very easy, just follow up on this message.
Jonathan K. Weedon wrote:
> So I believe the question is still open: how to run a scalable
> application correctly on WebLogic and Oracle.
Reading our documentation would be a good start.
Also, you can simply use optimistic concurrency at the database level, which
solves both your scalability and corruption issues. The database will
simply *not* let a corrupting update in. Period.
--
Cedric
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
