System & programming Concepts

[Zahid Rahman]

Dear All,   For those of you still unaware about the program I posted on websphere and I know a lot of you are because you made that known by criticising my program.   From my point of view it was a "noddy" piece of code which I wrote for a situation before I logged on EJBs.   I was confident that my logic was correct and problems existed some where else. I did not change anything in the program because I was that confident and wanted it to be looked at "as is" by those in whose domain those issues belonged.   I heard about the hardware bug about six years ago and have come across hardware problems not just in PCs but also in Mainframes.   I also read about the init method although the solution did not make sense and also about dynamic class loading and how it was treated in different JVMs. Read but not tried out personally myself.   I came to find out the answers in that program and also the classDefNotFoundError not ClassDefNotException. Answer which cannot be found in one place.   Ioin Woods who specialises in JVMs confirmed that different JVMs behave in a different ways.   He also informed me that an expert group is looking at the intermittent problem which I believe has turned out to be a hardware problem as I suspected and he had some knowledge of as well. I have come across intermittent problem before and know something about the cause.   I was asked by a company called thinkspark if I knew about dynamic class loading and I denied it because from his point of view if I know I am bright and if I don't know I am not. "Friendly" was also in a book so I suggest he tackles the book. I also refer thinkspark to the answer given to me by Ioin Woods that hardware is out of his domain so why does thinkspark think it is in mine domain I am at a loss to understand. Confused between remove and remove as well. I replied to Mr. Ioin Woods I will use what he wrote as a reference by this I also meant I know how to program and I will use him as a reference not what many of you say.   The list administrator looking at my program said I should apologise for the sake of creditability which was actually to my advantage in two ways so he should look for credibility.   I asked for client code also for two reasons , one to find out if it was a support line but it wasn't. I don't use products who have public lines such as those furthermore as I knew the Indians want to prove themselves to be better than us for commercial reasons but you proved other wise.   Products where they do not provide support I know from experience means they know about a fault in their product and I do not have to know about the details although I always like to find out.   Some Canadian idiot ( a few  days ago ) attacked me for my debugging on the Forte line which shows that he didn't know nothing about the hardware and have back fired on him. He was defending Dustin Callaway's Solution which was wrong. Somebody on this line wrote that I know the concepts but my Java isn't any good. Actually after having the opinions of the authority you do not know the concepts therefore you programming can't be any good. There is a port scanner at the back of that book.   I have to say that I have never come across so much inaccurate information since looking at Java.   Object Oriented Programming Concepts were the fashion about six years ago for a short while but know they have come in again.    The experts at JavaCard also looked at my code and said I should do that. It is good to have the real experts recognising one's ability.   Being in the UK I have access to a lot more information and accurate information and I think you will all do well to remember in the future.   Regards, Zahid Rahman Senior Consultant BusinessObjects Maidenhead UK. World's Number 1 Established for ten years. We specialise in Data Warehousing which every Management in every company needs for steering their business in the right direction.   P.S . Template is another term for a class as well. a very old term.