Re: System & programming Concepts

[Neil Poska]

Didn't you promise to remove yourself from this list a couple months ago? Zahid Rahman wrote: Dear All, For those of you still unaware about the program I posted on websphereand I know a lot of you are because you made that known bycriticising my program. From my point of view it was a "noddy" piece of code whichI wrote for a situation before I logged on EJBs. I was confident that my logic was correct and problemsexisted some where else. I did not change anythingin the program because I was that confident and wanted itto be looked at "as is" by those in whose domain those issuesbelonged. I heard about the hardware bug about six years ago and have come acrosshardware problems not just in PCs but also in Mainframes. I also read about the init method although the solution did not make senseand also about dynamic class loading and how it was treated in different JVMs.Read but not tried out personally myself. I came to find out the answers in that program and also theclassDefNotFoundError not ClassDefNotException. Answerwhich cannot be found in one place. Ioin Woods who specialises in JVMs confirmed that different JVMsbehave in a different ways. He also informed me that an expert group is looking at theintermittent problem which I believe has turned out to be ahardware problem as I suspected and he had some knowledge of as well.I have come across intermittent problem before andknow something about the cause. I was asked by a company called thinkspark if I knew about dynamicclass loading and I denied it because from his point of view if I knowI am bright and if I don't know I am not. "Friendly" was also in a bookso I suggest he tackles the book. I also refer thinkspark to the answer given tome by Ioin Woods that hardware is out of his domain so whydoes thinkspark think it is in mine domain I am at a loss to understand.Confused between remove and remove as well. I replied to Mr. Ioin WoodsI will use what he wrote as a reference by this I also meant I know how toprogram and I will use him as a reference not what many of you say. The list administrator looking at my program said I should apologisefor the sake of creditability which was actually to my advantagein two ways so he should look for credibility. I asked for client code also for two reasons , one to find outif it was a support line but it wasn't.I don't use products who have public lines such as thosefurthermore as I knew the Indians want to prove themselvesto be better than us for commercial reasons butyou proved other wise. Products where they do not provide support I know fromexperience means they know about a fault in their productand I do not have to know about the details althoughI always like to find out. Some Canadian idiot ( a few  days ago ) attacked me for my debuggingon the Forte line which shows that he didn't know nothing about the hardwareand have back fired on him. He was defending Dustin Callaway'sSolution which was wrong.Somebody on this line wrote that I know the concepts butmy Java isn't any good. Actually after having the opinionsof the authority you do not know the concepts thereforeyou programming can't be any good. There is a port scannerat the back of that book. I have to say that I have never come across somuch inaccurate information since looking at Java. Object Oriented Programming Concepts werethe fashion about six years ago for a short whilebut know they have come in again. The experts at JavaCard also looked at my codeand said I should do that. It is good to have the real expertsrecognising one's ability. Being in the UK I have access to a lot more informationand accurate information and I think you will all do wellto remember in the future. Regards,Zahid RahmanSenior ConsultantBusinessObjectsMaidenhead UK.World's Number 1 Established for ten years.We specialise in Data Warehousing which every Management in everycompany needs for steering their business in the right direction. P.S . Template is another term for a class as well.a very old term.