I think that the official answer is no. But I would think that since a sfsb has its passivation and activation callbacks that you would be able to control your participation with jms.
I think that your are supposed to go the route of message driven beans to modify the state and have the state in a place that is accessible to both the mdb and the sfsb.
don.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sven van �t Veer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 8:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Statefull ejb & JMS
Can a Statefull EJB implement the message listener interface ? I need
this to update the state of my bean.
Sven
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
