On 11 May 00, at 14:55, marc fleury wrote: > LET'S PUT THE BOARD TO WORK, > > guys let's vote on a "prepend notification" of the GPL, a la Linux 2.0 > so as to provide our interpretation of the GPL explicitely. We are > following their compenentization example as well as the license example. > +1 Dan O'Connor -- -------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Misleading info about the GPL? Mats Lofkvist
- Re: Misleading info about the GPL? Dan OConnor
- Re: Misleading info about the GPL? Mats Lofkvist
- Re: Misleading info about the GPL? Dan OConnor
- Re: Misleading info about the GPL? Mats Lofkvist
- GPL prepend Re: Misleading i... marc fleury
- Re: GPL prepend Re: Misl... Dan OConnor
- Re: GPL prepend Re: ... marc fleury
- Re: GPL prepend Re: ... Dan OConnor
- Re: GPL prepend Re: ... Rickard �berg
- GPL prepend Re: Misleadin... Justin Forder
- Re: GPL prepend Re: Misl... Mats Lofkvist
- Re: Misleading info about the GPL? Thor Heinrichs-Wolpert
- Re: Misleading info about the GPL? marc fleury
- Re: Misleading info about the... Thor Heinrichs-Wolpert
- Re: Misleading info about... marc fleury
- Re: Misleading info about the GPL? Geoff Hill
