Re: GPL prepend Re: Misleading info about the GPL?

[Mats Lofkvist]

marc fleury wrote:

   the note does explicitely say that "normal use of the kernel by
   programs" is *not* under "derived work".
   which is exactly equivalent to "normal use (j2ee calls) of the container
   by beans" is *not* under "derived work".

I'm considering it an exception to the license rather than an
interpretation, but who cares?  The end result from adding a
similiar text will be the same in either case, so I'm happy.

Thanks to all for not smoking in this area :-)

           /mats


--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]