On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 20:54:44 +0100 Eugen Dedu <[email protected]> wrote: > Chris Vine wrote: > > On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:30:06 +0000 > > Chris Vine <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 08:31:58 +0100 > >> yannick <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> You can test ekiga 3.2.6 for karmic with the patch here: > >>> https://launchpad.net/~sevmek/+archive/ppa > >>> > >>> I do no used "ekiga-released" as I consider it as official and I > >>> do not want to confuse users of it with some testing. > >> I am not using karmic. Can you please post the patch here and I > >> will recompile libopal. > > > > And could you also state whether libopal as patched is binary > > compatible: that is, do I also need to recompile ekiga? > > No, you do not need to. > > More generally: An application needs recompiling only when its > interface changes. That's the reason why on every machine you can > update the system, sometimes only a library is updated, but all the > applications depending on it see the change.
This is a C++ library where the most trivial changes can break binary compatibility. Interface changes won't if they only comprise additional non-virtual methods, otherwise they will. Having no interface changes will still break compatibility if class membership changes. Anyway, on looking at the patch there are no interface modifications of any kind, nor change of class membership, so we look to be OK. Chris _______________________________________________ ekiga-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
