I primarily use my K2 for CW and I sold my KAF2 about 3 months after I got the KDSP2....I love it...I'll put this rig up against anything else...when using the Crystal filters and KDSP2 all I hear is the CW station...I have no noise or ringing or anything...I'd shoot for the KDSP2 if I were you.
Gregg R. Lengling, W9DHI, Retired Administrator http://www.milwaukeehdtv.org K2/100 S#3075 KX1 S# 57 Member: ARRL, RSGB, RCA, WERA and ORC -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard W. Ashcraft Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 3:19 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] KAF2 v. KDSP2 I am planning on purchasing a K2 for general use (SSB and CW) with a current preference for CW. (I enjoy working on CW although I'm not very good.) My preferences may change as my experience grows, so flexibility is important. The question is, why would you want to have the KAF2 instead of the KDSP2? >From querying the archives, it seems that the KAF2 is primarily used for CW and is effective for that use. Is the KDSP2 less effective for reducing unwanted noise on CW, or is it equally effective but more costly. I assume that Elecraft continues to sell the KAF2 because it either has a performance advantage in some niche or is less costly and works for certain uses (such as CW). Thanks for the advice, Howard Ashcraft W1WF _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
