Howard, I can't speak for anyone else, but I just don't like the sound of any audio DSP processor, particularly for CW use. They are good for digging signals out very close to the noise level, but my ears find the KAF2 far less irritating for extended operating periods.
It is more a matter of personal preference - the KDSP2 users seem to be quite happy with it, and I have built several for other hams, so I have had opportunity to listen to both on a bit more than a casual basis. For mostly SSB operation I can recommend the KDSP2 for no other reason than the noise reduction, but I personally find I can do without it. Each to his own - if you could listen to both before making up your mind you can make a better decision. With the KDSP2 you can adjust the parameters to alter the sound, but chosing the 'correct' ones for your ears may take a while and a lot of trial and error. 73, Don W3FPR ----- Original Message ----- I am planning on purchasing a K2 for general use (SSB and CW) with a current preference for CW. (I enjoy working on CW although I'm not very good.) My preferences may change as my experience grows, so flexibility is important. The question is, why would you want to have the KAF2 instead of the KDSP2? >From querying the archives, it seems that the KAF2 is primarily used for CW and is effective for that use. Is the KDSP2 less effective for reducing unwanted noise on CW, or is it equally effective but more costly. I assume that Elecraft continues to sell the KAF2 because it either has a performance advantage in some niche or is less costly and works for certain uses (such as CW). _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [email protected] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
