Agree about coverage, but 350 - 500kHz is ample for my particular interests. I think that I chose an IF of 14 MHz for 6m and 2m for reasons of receiver spurious responses or transmitter spurii, or both, but as the choice was made about 50 years ago I won't swear to this before re-running an analysis.
73, Geoff. GM4ESD ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Coleman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "S55M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Elecraft" <elecraft@mailman.qth.net> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 8:44 PM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] 14361! > > On Mar 21, 2005, at 6:03 PM, S55M wrote: > > > > While surfing arround on Elecraft list archives i read abt 14361 > > birdie. > > The common statment is "Thanks God is out of band" > > Not if You are using 144/14MHz transverter :( > > Why use 14 MHz as an IF? Seems like 28 MHz is a better choice -- and > you get 2 MHz of coverage instead of nominally 350-500 kHz. > > Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!" > -- Wilbur Wright, 1901 > _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
